🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.